Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med ; 31(1): 25, 2021 05 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1243300

ABSTRACT

Chronic breathlessness is a distressing symptom that is challenging to manage. The Breathing, Thinking, Functioning clinical model is an educational tool developed to support breathlessness management. Health professionals report that the model increases clinician and patient understanding of this complex symptom, and provides a simple and structured approach to personalised self-management.


Subject(s)
Dyspnea , Self-Management , Dyspnea/etiology , Dyspnea/therapy , Health Services , Humans
2.
Ann Fam Med ; 19(2): 135-140, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1123691

ABSTRACT

The use of big data containing millions of primary care medical records provides an opportunity for rapid research to help inform patient care and policy decisions during the first and subsequent waves of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Routinely collected primary care data have previously been used for national pandemic surveillance, quantifying associations between exposures and outcomes, identifying high risk populations, and examining the effects of interventions at scale, but there is no consensus on how to effectively conduct or report these data for COVID-19 research. A COVID-19 primary care database consortium was established in April 2020 and its researchers have ongoing COVID-19 projects in overlapping data sets with over 40 million primary care records in the United Kingdom that are variously linked to public health, secondary care, and vital status records. This consensus agreement is aimed at facilitating transparency and rigor in methodological approaches, and consistency in defining and reporting cases, exposures, confounders, stratification variables, and outcomes in relation to the pharmacoepidemiology of COVID-19. This will facilitate comparison, validation, and meta-analyses of research during and after the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Consensus , Databases, Factual/standards , Medical Records Systems, Computerized/standards , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Public Health Surveillance , Big Data , COVID-19/diagnosis , Humans , Pharmacoepidemiology , Public Health , United Kingdom/epidemiology
3.
BMJ Open ; 10(7):e036879-e036879, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-662082

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Primary care interventions are often multicomponent, with several targets (eg, patients and healthcare professionals). Improving Primary Care After Stroke (IPCAS) is a novel primary care-based model of long-term stroke care involving a review of stroke-related needs, a self-management programme, a direct point of contact in general practice, enhanced communication between care services, and a directory of national and local community services, currently being evaluated in a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT). Informed by Medical Research Council guidance for complex interventions and the Behaviour Change Consortium fidelity framework, this protocol outlines the process evaluation of IPCAS within this RCT. The process evaluation aimed to explore how the intervention was delivered in context and how participants engaged with the intervention. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Mixed methods will be used: (1) design: intervention content will be compared with 'usual care';(2) training: intervention training sessions will be audio/video-recorded where feasible;(3) delivery: healthcare professional self-reports, audio recordings of intervention delivery and observations of My Life After Stroke course (10% of reviews and sessions) will be coded separately;semistructured interviews will be conducted with a purposive sample of healthcare professionals;(4) receipt and (5) enactment: where available, structured stroke review records will be analysed quantitatively;semistructured interviews will be conducted with a purposive sample of study participants. Self-reports, observations and audio/video recordings will be coded and scored using specifically developed checklists. Semistructured interviews will be analysed thematically. Data will be analysed iteratively, independent of primary endpoint analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Favourable ethical opinion was gained from Yorkshire &The Humber-Bradford Leeds NHS Research Ethics Committee (19 December 2017, 17/YH/0441). Study results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03353519;Pre-results.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL